Which active listening technique is considered more active?

The technique identified as more active within the context of active listening is emotional labeling. This approach involves recognizing and naming the emotions that the speaker is expressing. By identifying specific emotions, the listener demonstrates a deeper engagement with the speaker's experience, fostering a more empathetic connection. Emotional labeling encourages the speaker to delve further into their feelings, which can lead to a more meaningful dialogue.

In contrast, paraphrasing and summarization are valuable active listening techniques, yet they primarily focus on restating or condensing the information shared by the speaker. These techniques are important for ensuring understanding but may not foster the same level of emotional connection as labeling feelings does. While summarization sometimes consolidates the main points of a discussion, it doesn't delve into the emotional nuances that can enhance conversational depth. Thus, emotional labeling stands out as the most active listening technique, as it requires keen observation and responsiveness to the emotional context of the communication.